Winner: Best Paper in Corporate Finance Award 2016 FMA Annual Meeting, 2017 AFA Paper
Theoretical models on group decision-making suggest that sub-group usage can affect communication among members and decision quality. To examine the trade-offs from forming sub-groups, we assemble a detailed dataset on corporate boards (groups) and committees (sub-groups). Boards have increasingly used committees staffed entirely by outside directors. Twenty percent of all director meetings occurred in such committees in 1996; this increased to over forty percent by 2010. We find evidence that such committee usage can erect barriers to communication and impair decision-making. Sub-groups are relatively understudied, but our results suggest that they play an important role in group functioning.View Online Appendix
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2018, Vol. 53, 1101-1133
While corporate political connections are known to enhance firm values, we demonstrate that union political activity can have the opposite effect. We examine the consequences of a recent state law in Australia that restricts union political activity, but does not change collective bargaining rights. In the wake of this law, the values of affected unionized firms significantly increase and, consistent with this market reaction, these firms are able to negotiate more favorable labor contracts than their unionized peers in other states. The evidence strongly suggests that unions use political activism to extract rents from corporations and benefit their members.
Journal of Financial Economics, 2015, Vol. 118, 399-430
We show that an executive is optimistic about her company's prospects if and only if she retains some of the shares received whenever she exercises company stock options. Empirically, an indicator of optimism based on this idea matches the expected relations between optimism and corporate decision-making better than commonly used indicators based on the timing of option exercise. This makes sense, as our model of an executive's optimal option exercise and portfolio choice demonstrates that the timing of option exercise depends just as much on stock and other executive characteristics as it does on optimism.
Financial Analysts Journal, 2001, Vol. 57, 41-51
The anecdotal evidence is growing that postings in Internet financial forums affect stock prices, either because the postings contain new information or because they represent successful attempts to manipulate stock prices. From an investment perspective, knowing whether this phenomenon is pervasive is important. We examined the relationship between Internet message board activity and abnormal stock returns and trading volume in the period from mid-April 1999 to mid-February 2000. Our study focused on the RagingBull.com discussion forum, an extremely popular site whose format permits the construction of an objective measure of investor opinions. For stocks in the Internet service sector, we found that on days with abnormally high message activity, changes in investor opinion correlated with abnormal industry-adjusted returns. These event days also coincided with abnormally high trading volume, which persisted for a second day. However, we found that message board activity did not predict industry-adjusted returns or abnormal trading volume, which is consistent with market efficiency.